Now that we're in one, we might shorten the closing date.
Astronomers now doubt there’s a Planet Nine: https://earthsky.org/space/astronomer-doubt-p…
Meticulous deep survey chalks up prior "clustering" to known observational biases.
In the state of Washington (one of the hardest hit) the Dept H says it can only test 100 per day. That effectively caps the reported growth rate in the state because facilities can't grow exponentially like a pandemic.
In other words, when you think on "confirmed", you must allow for confirmation bottle-necks.
@EvanHarper Efforts to control the pandemic will harm the economy more than the virus itself. In a sense, we are spending wealth in exchange for health (or trying to anyway).
@DebbySheran wrote:
When everybody becomes very intelligent, we will have zero global catastrophes.
Intelligence /= Wisdom
— edited by Uncle Jeff
So if ML becomes robust, then image CAPTCHA dies, and if image CAPTCHA stays ahead of ML, then ML isn't robust? (Just pointing out that in some cases, the ML is the attacker and the adversarial image is the defense).
— edited by Uncle Jeff
@moderators Since prop 22 looks like it is passing, this Q seems headed toward ambiguity.
Beware: Stats / forecasts typically give percents of all vehicles, but the question asks FCEV as a percent of electrics. If electrics displace all internal combustion, then I suppose there's no difference, but... YMMV
For a question on written law, instead of media outlets, we should use an official .gov source such as GovInfo, the National Archives, Library of Congress and/or the Federal Register.
See www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992/pd…
— edited by Uncle Jeff
Will the current crisis between India and Pakistan escalate to war?
@Jgalt At this rate, SpaceX's Dragon will serve the ISS before Boeing's 737-Max serves Disneyland.
@youknowone wrote:
Should I make a question "Will any question in Metaculus will be negatively resolved during its period in 2019?"
How about this one: "Will any question resolution be reversed (e.g. on appeal or late evidence) in 2019?" Count only positive <-> negative, not to or from ambiguous.
The 1918 flu pandemic and WW II each killed about 3% of global population, and those were at least partly offset by growth, so net 10% loss would be mind-blowing. To find such great loss in the past, I had to search back through the Black Death (14th C) and the Plague of Justinian (6th C). I just hope that modern technology does more to forestall such harrowing times than to cause them.
@Nostradamnus The United States has a criminally deficient testing capacity. I just received junk mail from my state rep (Washington) informing me that the state is proud to be able to test 200 people per day, and that he has voted for a plan to increase testing to 400 per day before the end of the year. No wonder the stats are increasing linearly; the testing per day is a linear choke-point :\
@Pshyeah wrote:
Could the Patreon link in the upper right be changed to another colour...
Ooooh... How about a brighter green, and you could make it blink incessantly unless one has contributed within the last year.
I'd like to be able to see a question's proposed closing date while the question is "upcoming". Right now, while upcoming, the question's opening date fills that space. Both dates should be displayed so that the closing date can always be part of the question discussion even if it is not mentioned in the main text.
I was interested in the question right up until I read the totally capricious resolution meta-criterion. It enables us to choose the answer without regard for any reality. That's bullshit!
Be a scholar (or futurist) and come up with some real measure of the human condition for us to bet on (or against).
Incidentally, I see genetic engineering and space colonization as potential fulcra for a sea-change in the human condition.
— edited by Uncle Jeff