The community is way too high here. The analogies from UST to Tether are tenuous at best, I think. By far the most likely case for Tether, I think, is that it is fully backed by something not quite cash equivalent, but pretty close, and it crashing below 50c for a full week seems very unlikely.
@JonathanRay That would be an interesting question if it were written, but this question is also interesting and nothing is stopping them coexisting.
On reflection I would say that it's not yet "sufficiently clear that they have accepted that they will not legally be President on 2021-01-21" from that tweet alone.
Even if they could produce cultured meat at a cost effective scale, which nobody can right now, and had a market just as large as plant based meats are now (which would require unprecedented growth by 2023), it still wouldn't be in their interests to make a profit in such an early stage as they would spend to prioritise expansion.
@Anthony I made my prediction based on the res criteria, at this point if the council/committee hasn't met and voted already it feels like ambiguous is the only reasonable option. Quite a bit seems to have been published on this since May 1st such that the council may have changed their minds since then.
This is true at current market prices, with TSLA up 5% to 770 intraday and AMZN down 1% to 3185, and Musk more than 1x leveraged to TSLA due to his options positions.
Bloomberg I presume only use closing prices for their index, but if nothing changes this will resolve tonight.
Text says Kharkiv, looks like a copy paste error @admins
GJ Superforecaster Robert de Neufville says he updated from 65% to 25% in the past 24hrs
Decreasing from 35% on Russian statements suggesting their goals are now more limited than they were, reducing the tail risks.
~95% chance Macron runs and makes runoff
~60% chance Macron faces LePen in runoff ~90% chance Macron wins vs LePen
~25% chance he faces Bertrand ~40% chance he beats Bertrand
~15% chance he faces 'other' ~70% chance he beats 'other'
0.95 x (.6 x .9 + .25 x .4+.15 x .7) = 0.71
— edited by Charles
It seems crazy that this is at 25% for the next 5 years when the other question is at 45% for the next 29 years.
Updating down from 23% based on Zvi Mowshowitz' latest blog post and accompanying prediction:
Chance that Omicron is importantly more virulent than Delta: 25% → 10%.
Updating from 35% on the Bucha news and reaction, this now seems more likely than not to me but could still quite easily not happen.
— edited by Charles
@mumpskin I would find it hard to believe Mariupol is not an outlier. Why would the place that gets the most attention for how bad the situation is be a place of average badness? Much more likely it is among the worst.
I'm not sure why the community is so low here - the US is less vaccinated and more open than the UK, just a little behind on the curve. What do people think will stop the spread? Are those who will catch it less likely to get themselves tested?
Next potential questions if this does resolve today: will he still be the richest in 2025? 2030?
I'm a bit skeptical TSLA stays this high, personally.